|
Hearing Aids |
||||||||
|
Styles & Technology Hearing Aid Styles There are several types of hearing aids. Each type offers different advantages, depending on its design, levels of amplification, and size. Before purchasing any hearing aid, ask whether it has a warranty that will allow you to try it out. Most manufacturers allow a 30- to 60-day trial period during which aids can be returned for a refund. There are four basic styles of hearing aids for people with sensorineural hearing loss:
Hearing Aid Technology The inside mechanisms of hearing aids vary among devices, even if they are the same style. Three types of circuitry, or electronics, are used:
The Programmable Advantage One of the most exciting developments of the past several years is the programmable hearing aid. Unlike standard hearing aids, which arrive preset from the factory/manufacturer, programmable hearing aids can be computer adjusted/programmed at our office. We do this by plugging the hearing aids in to the computer using specialized software designed to send instructions to a tiny computer chip in the hearing aid ... telling it how to operate to best meet your needs. Programmable hearing aids are now available in behind-the-ear and in-the ear / in-the-canal styles. You do have some choice of style depending upon the degree of your hearing loss. The newest types of programmable hearing aids are 100% digital. Just like CD and other music formats have been for several years. This technology has been miniaturized to fit into small hearing aids. Programmable hearing aids offer advantages over conventional devices: better sound quality, flexibility and better clarity of speech because they are custom programmed to your hearing loss. The programs can be changed an infinite number of times either because your hearing has changed or the environments you are in are changing. For example, you hear better in a quiet room, but if you go out to a restaurant you will have more difficulty. Your hearing loss has not changed, just your ability to hear well in a poor acoustic environment. Programmable devices can address environmental problems as well as hearing loss. In multiple memory programmable devices, we give you a program for quiet listening and one for noisy listening. You decide when and where you use either program. The Digital Advantage There has been explosion in the number of digital hearing aids on the market in the last five years. At last count, there are 22 manufacturers with digital hearing aids marketed under 40 different model names. Manufacturers are moving toward their third or fourth generation of digital products. The technology is here to stay--but are digital hearing aids really better? Digital hearing aids first came to market in 1987 with two manufacturers introducing hearing aids with digital signal processing (DSP) before the end of the 1980s. While high-tech for their time, these hearing aids had little success and were soon abandoned due to their large size and high battery drain. Nearly a decade later, two separate manufacturers once again introduced digital hearing aids. By this time, the technology had improved so that these hearing aids could be produced in a range of popular styles, from behind-the-ear (BTE) to completely-in-the-canal (CIC). Despite their higher cost, they were well received by clinicians and consumers. This early success, combined with the promise of highly advanced signal processing, ensured that digital hearing aid technology had come of age. So how far have we come? What is the current "state-of-the art" technology in digital hearing aids? Are digital hearing aids really superior to their analog counterparts? To determine whether digital hearing aids are better for patients, it is important to focus on the superior processing and features of these instruments. Digital hearing aids can't be described as if they are a separate entity from analog hearing aids. "Digital" simply indicates that the analog waveform is converted into a string of numbers for processing; and unfortunately, there is nothing inherently magical about this process. A linear, output-clipping, digital hearing aid could easily be built that would provide sound quality and speech recognition inferior to many analog hearing aids. Therefore, digital isn't superior just because it's digital, but because DSP allows manufacturers to create hearing aids with enhanced processing and features. Current Research The National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) supports more than 30 grants for scientists to conduct studies on hearing aid research and development. These studies cover areas such as the application of new signal processing strategies and ways to improve sound transmission and reduce noise interference, as well as psychophysical studies of the impact of abnormal hearing function on speech recognition. Other studies focus on the best way to select and fit hearing aids in children and other difficult-to-test populations, and on reducing bothersome aspects such as feedback and the occlusion effect. Further research will determine the best ways to manipulate speech signals in order to enhance understanding. To improve hearing aid performance, especially in noisy situations, NIDCD has entered into two collaborative ventures. The first was formed between NIDCD and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to expand and intensify hearing aid research and development. The program includes a contract for the development of hearing aids as well as clinical trials. The knowledge gained will be used to help people choose the best hearing aid for their particular type of hearing impairment. In the second collaboration, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the VA have joined NIDCD in surveying all Federal laboratories for acoustic and electronic technologies that might improve hearing aids. The most promising technologies have been presented to auditory scientists and hearing aid manufacturers in the hope of forming research partnerships that will lead to commercial application of these technologies.
References Excerpts from May 1999, NIH Pub. No. 99-4340 |



